W. W. Grainger management check

GWW · Industrials · Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components · CEO D.G. Macpherson

Filings as of

74
Management score, ranked 123rd of 487Strongest: stable leadership. Weakest: pay for performance. See the best and worst run in Industrials →

5 good · 2 to watch · 0 flagged, across the seven questions below.

  • Good

    Have owners done well?

    Beat its chosen peers

    $100 invested at the start of fiscal 2021 grew to $261, against $231 for the peer group the company picked itself.

  • Watch

    Does pay follow performance?

    Pay only loosely tracked returns

    Over 5 years, the CEO's pay actually paid (equity valued at the share price) had a correlation of -0.21 with shareholder return. 1 means pay moved in step; below 0, the opposite way.

  • Good

    What does the CEO cost owners?

    0.7% of net income

    $11.6m of reported pay in fiscal 2025, against $1.7bn of net income.

  • Watch

    Do they own the stock?

    Insiders are selling

    3 insiders sold $3.2m in the last six months and none bought.

  • Good

    Are owners being diluted?

    Share count shrinking

    Diluted shares changed -2.1% a year over the last three fiscal years. Stock-based pay was 0.4% of revenue in the latest year.

  • Good

    Is leadership stable?

    3 leadership filings in 3 years

    CEO in the pay table: D.G. Macpherson. 3 filings under 8-K item 5.02 (officers or directors leaving or joining, or new pay arrangements) in the last 3 years.

  • Good

    Are the books clean?

    No red flags on file

    No restatements, auditor changes or late filings since 2021.

Against the S&P 500

Each check's score (0–100) and how it compares: the share of ranked S&P 500 companies it matches or beats, and the median in Industrials.

CheckScoreAt or aboveSector median
Owner returns6667%55
Pay for performance398%86
CEO cost6465%48
Skin in the game——55
Dilution7669%62
Stable leadership100100%75
Clean books100100%100

Closest peers

Others in Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components, by management score. W. W. Grainger is 18th of 81 in its sector.

  1. 120HUBBHubbell Incorporated75
  2. 123GWWW. W. Grainger74
  3. 151PHParker Hannifin72
  4. 170OTISOtis Worldwide71
  5. 179SNASnap-on70
  6. 196DOVDover Corporation69
  7. 197IRIngersoll Rand69
  8. 213PNRPentair68
  9. 286XYLXylem Inc.62
  10. 293NDSNNordson Corporation62

Pay versus performance

From the proxy statement filed March 10, 2026. "Actually paid" values stock awards at the share price, so it rises and falls with the stock.

CEO pay by fiscal yearAs reported Actually paid
$0$11.5m$23.0m20212022202320242025
What $100 becameCompany Peer group
$10020212022202320242025$261
Fiscal yearCEOCEO payActually paidOther executives (avg)$100 becamePeersNet income
2025D.G. Macpherson$11.6m$9.1m$3.9m$261$231$1.7bn
2024—$10.9m$15.8m$3.1m$270$208$1.9bn
2023—$10.2m$23.0m$3.0m$211$179$1.8bn
2022—$10.0m$14.3m$3.1m$140$121$1.5bn
2021—$9.0m$16.3m$2.1m$129$137$1.0bn

The board says pay is tied most to Adjusted ROIC. Its other key measures: Daily, Organic Constant Currency Sales, Share Gain—High-Touch Solutions—U.S., Daily, Organic Constant Currency Sales in Local Days—Endless Assortment, Adjusted, Constant Currency Operating Margin.

Insiders and the CEO's stake

3 insiders sold $3.2m in the last six months and none bought.

  • SoldPaige K RobbinsSr. VP$1.8mMay 12, 2026
  • SoldJonny M LeRoySVP, Chief Technology Officer$1.1mMay 12, 2026
  • SoldLaurie R ThomsonVP, Controller$386kMay 12, 2026

Leadership and governance on file

Latest shareholder vote results: May 1, 2026, including the say-on-pay vote.

Where the money went

Over 2021–2025: $6.4bn returned to owners in buybacks and dividends, 80% of net income, and $278.0m of pay in stock.

Fiscal year20212022202320242025
Revenue$13.0bn$15.2bn$16.5bn$17.2bn$17.9bn
Net income$1.0bn$1.5bn$1.8bn$1.9bn$1.7bn
Stock-based pay$42.0m$48.0m$62.0m$62.0m$64.0m
Buybacks$695.0m$603.0m$850.0m$1.2bn$1.0bn
Dividends$357.0m$370.0m$392.0m$421.0m$467.0m
Diluted shares52m51m50m49m48m

Educational only, not investment advice. Figures are as filed with the SEC: pay from the proxy's pay-versus-performance table, capital allocation from 10-K XBRL data, insider trades from Form 4s over the last six months, events from the last 5 years of filings. The peer group is the one the company chose. See the method.