Honeywell Technologies management check

HON · Industrials · Industrial Conglomerates · CEO Vimal Kapur

Filings as of

39
Management score, ranked 470th of 487Strongest: clean books. Weakest: skin in the game. See the best and worst run in Industrials →

2 good · 2 to watch · 2 flagged, across the seven questions below.

  • Flag

    Have owners done well?

    Trailed its chosen peers

    $100 invested at the start of fiscal 2021 grew to $108, against $189 for the peer group the company picked itself.

  • Watch

    Does pay follow performance?

    Pay only loosely tracked returns

    Over 5 years, the CEO's pay actually paid (equity valued at the share price) had a correlation of -0.01 with shareholder return. 1 means pay moved in step; below 0, the opposite way.

  • n/a

    What does the CEO cost owners?

    Not enough data

    No pay or net income figure for the latest year.

  • Watch

    Do they own the stock?

    CEO stake ≈ 0.0 years of pay

    The CEO holds 2,337 shares, directly or through trusts (unvested awards not counted): about 0.0 years of pay. Light activity: no buys, $4.2m sold in six months.

  • Good

    Are owners being diluted?

    Share count shrinking

    Diluted shares changed -1.9% a year over the last three fiscal years. Stock-based pay was 0.5% of revenue in the latest year.

  • Flag

    Is leadership stable?

    2 CEOs in the pay table

    CEOs in the pay table: Darius Adamczyk, Vimal Kapur. 15 filings under 8-K item 5.02 (officers or directors leaving or joining, or new pay arrangements) in the last 3 years.

  • Good

    Are the books clean?

    No red flags on file

    No restatements, auditor changes or late filings since 2021.

Against the S&P 500

Each check's score (0–100) and how it compares: the share of ranked S&P 500 companies it matches or beats, and the median in Industrials.

CheckScoreAt or aboveSector median
Owner returns016%55
Pay for performance4911%86
CEO cost——48
Skin in the game06%55
Dilution7466%62
Stable leadership107%75
Clean books100100%100

Closest peers

Others in Industrial Conglomerates, by management score. Honeywell Technologies is 80th of 81 in its sector.

  1. 396MMM3M54
  2. 416DDDuPont51
  3. 443AXONAxon Enterprise47
  4. 458LIILennox International44
  5. 470HONHoneywell Technologies39
  6. 486SWKStanley Black & Decker29

Pay versus performance

From the proxy statement filed April 10, 2026. "Actually paid" values stock awards at the share price, so it rises and falls with the stock.

CEO pay by fiscal yearAs reported Actually paid
$0$18.4m$36.7m20212022202320242025
What $100 becameCompany Peer group
$10020212022202320242025$108
Fiscal yearCEOCEO payActually paidOther executives (avg)$100 becamePeersNet income
2025Vimal Kapur$20.4m$10.9m$5.2m$108$189—
2024Vimal Kapur$18.3m$21.6m$6.7m$115$158—
2023Vimal Kapur, Darius Adamczyk$23.0m$21.5m$6.5m$105$135—
2022Darius Adamczyk$25.4m$36.7m$8.3m$105$114—
2021Darius Adamczyk$26.1m$15.7m$7.5m$100$121—

Its other key measures: Adjusted Earnings Per Share, Average Segment Margin, Free Cash Flow, Cumulative Revenue, Average Return on Investment, Relative Total Shareowner Return.

Insiders and the CEO's stake

Vimal Kapur (Chief Executive Officer) held 2,337 shares directly after their latest Form 4 on Jul 28, 2026, roughly $582k at that filing's price.

Light activity: no buys, $4.2m sold in six months.

  • SoldKenneth J WestPres/CEO Process Technologies$4.2mAug 3, 2026

Leadership and governance on file

Latest shareholder vote results: May 27, 2026, including the say-on-pay vote.

Where the money went

Over 2021–2025: $30.8bn returned to owners in buybacks and dividends, 116% of net income, and $987.0m of pay in stock.

Fiscal year20212022202320242025
Revenue$34.4bn$35.5bn$33.0bn$34.7bn$37.4bn
Net income$5.5bn$5.0bn$5.7bn$5.7bn$4.7bn
Stock-based pay$217.0m$188.0m$197.0m$189.0m$196.0m
Buybacks$3.4bn$4.2bn$3.7bn$1.7bn$3.8bn
Dividends$2.6bn$2.7bn$2.9bn$2.9bn$3.0bn
Diluted shares700m683m668m655m643m

Educational only, not investment advice. Figures are as filed with the SEC: pay from the proxy's pay-versus-performance table, capital allocation from 10-K XBRL data, insider trades from Form 4s over the last six months, events from the last 5 years of filings. The peer group is the one the company chose. See the method.